Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Well, is she?

Hello reading person. Sorry there's been such a big gap between weblog posts. Google made it impossible to be logged into two of their accounts on the same computer at once, or something, and that has made logging in to write on the blog much more of a chore than it usually is, or something. And given that it is never imperative in any way for me to make posts to the blog (case-in-point: that "big gap" between posts will, for you, be measured in inches [about two of them], and not in weeks or months. In other words, nobody reads this), it took a back seat to other things, like not posting, quite easily. So, what could be important enough to make me log out of one Google account and into another to document here? I'll tell you, shall I?

This is what I saw when I went to Comcast.net just now:


I saw this, among numerous other grabby headlines, such as "Sinead O'Conner to Wed for Fourth Time". Incidentally, the reason I visited Comcast.net was to pay my home internet bill, so that I could have continued, unlimited access to a medium whereby I can stay updated on all this garbage.

So here's what I want to know: is Kate Middleton hidding a baby bump? And if so, how is she doing it? As a young person, I hid my fair share of bumps and other things, but I never found it necessary to hidd anything, bump or other. I'm not sure what would force someone into hidding something, nor am I clear on how they would accomplish it. So if Princess Kate is indeed hidding that bump, she is a cleverer chap than I. I suppose if anyone has hidding capability, it is someone who has the wiles and resources of MI6 at her disposal (does she have those things at her disposal? I would imagine she at least has a small contingent with her all the time).

You may be wondering, at this point, if I am really so interested in how she's managing to hidd her baby bump, why haven't I clicked on the link and read the story? Same reason I haven't logged out of Google account A and into Google account B to write a blog post in so long: it's easier not to.



No comments: